Abstract
Integration is a pivotal concept in migration studies. Yet, over time critiques have been formulated that question the very assumptions that the concept of integration rests on. Willem Schinkel, one of the major criticasters explains what is wrong with the concept. Is it that bad? Some of his discussants believe yes, but offer alternative conceptualizations as way out, whilst others believe the critique is unjustified and write in defense of integration.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 16 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-3 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Comparative Migration Studies |
| Volume | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 May 2019 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Integration
- Integration as governance technique
- Integration critiques
- Relational integration
- Superdiversity
Cite this
}
Who needs integration? Debating a central, yet increasingly contested concept in migration studies. / Saharso, Sawitri.
In: Comparative Migration Studies, Vol. 7, 16, 01.05.2019, p. 1-3.Research output: Contribution to Journal › Editorial › Academic › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Who needs integration? Debating a central, yet increasingly contested concept in migration studies
AU - Saharso, Sawitri
PY - 2019/5/1
Y1 - 2019/5/1
N2 - Integration is a pivotal concept in migration studies. Yet, over time critiques have been formulated that question the very assumptions that the concept of integration rests on. Willem Schinkel, one of the major criticasters explains what is wrong with the concept. Is it that bad? Some of his discussants believe yes, but offer alternative conceptualizations as way out, whilst others believe the critique is unjustified and write in defense of integration.
AB - Integration is a pivotal concept in migration studies. Yet, over time critiques have been formulated that question the very assumptions that the concept of integration rests on. Willem Schinkel, one of the major criticasters explains what is wrong with the concept. Is it that bad? Some of his discussants believe yes, but offer alternative conceptualizations as way out, whilst others believe the critique is unjustified and write in defense of integration.
KW - Integration
KW - Integration as governance technique
KW - Integration critiques
KW - Relational integration
KW - Superdiversity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065195857&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065195857&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s40878-019-0123-9
DO - 10.1186/s40878-019-0123-9
M3 - Editorial
VL - 7
SP - 1
EP - 3
JO - Comparative Migration Studies
JF - Comparative Migration Studies
SN - 2214-594X
M1 - 16
ER -