Who owns Intersectionality? Some reflections on feminist debates on how theories travel

Kathy Davis*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book / Report / Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

35 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Feminist scholars have increasingly expressed their worries about the depoliticization of intersectionality since it has travelled from its point of origin in US Black feminist theory to the shores of Europe. They have argued that the subject for which the theory was intended has been displaced, that Black feminists have been excluded from the discussion, and that white European feminists have usurped all the credit for intersectionality as theory. Intersectionality has been transformed into a product of the neoliberal academy rather than the helpmeet for social justice it was meant to be. This article explores three of the bones of contention in these debates about intersectionality and its travels. The author argues that they rest on notions of ownership that, while understandable, are untenable, and, ultimately, counterproductive. A case will be made for taking a less proprietary stance towards critical theories and instead treating the travels of intersectionality as an occasion for dialogue rather than a contest over ownership.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Routledge International Handbook of Intersectionality Studies
EditorsKathy Davis, Helma Lutz
PublisherRoutledge
Chapter24
Pages319-331
Number of pages13
ISBN (Electronic)9781003089520
ISBN (Print)9780367545048
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Who owns Intersectionality? Some reflections on feminist debates on how theories travel'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this