Abstract
Highlighting public-service actors’ deliberately tokenistic or self-serving efforts, existing literature has shown that public participation often involves the co-optation of sympathetic citizens. In contrast, our study demonstrates that participatory advocates may discredit and marginalize critical voices despite their own inclusive, democratic ideals. We analyze the entangled legitimacy claims of participating citizens and “inviting” public-service actors, capturing (a) the often-unintended dynamics through which the inclusion of particular participants legitimizes the exclusion of others, while illuminating (b) the tenacious propensity of participatory initiatives to establish “constructive cooperation” as the norm for participation and, subsequently, to normalize exclusionary practices.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 543-574 |
Number of pages | 32 |
Journal | Administration and Society |
Volume | 54 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 11 Aug 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Apr 2022 |