Whom do we trust to lead us? effects of leaders’ dominance-based leadership, prestige-based leadership and physical formidability.

Ard Barends*, Wendy de Waal-Andrews

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Drawing on evolutionary perspectives of leadership and hierarchy, we argue that hierarchical strategies and physical formidability of leaders affect followers’ trust. Specifically, prestige should increase trust, dominance should reduce trust and physical formidability should strengthen these effects. We tested these hypotheses in three experimental studies (total n = 1884), using survey and behavioral measures of trust. We found that a dominance-based leadership style consistently reduced trust in leaders whereas using a prestige-based leadership style consistently increased it. However, physical formidability didn’t moderate these effects, nor did it affect trust directly. Although more research seems needed to understand more fine-grained effects of physical formidability on different factors of trustworthiness, our results suggest that leadership styles are important predictors of how much leaders are trusted.
Original languageEnglish
Article number2256492
Number of pages18
JournalSocial Influence
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Sept 2023

Funding

We are grateful to Toine Bartholomeus for his input in developing the ideas that are central to this project and for designing and running an initial pilot study. We thank Toine and Niels Bartholomeus for modeling for the physical formidability stimuli and Dagmar Haggenburg for creating the images.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Whom do we trust to lead us? effects of leaders’ dominance-based leadership, prestige-based leadership and physical formidability.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this