Who’s Afraid of Adversariality? Conflict and Cooperation in Argumentation

Catarina Dutilh Novaes*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Since at least the 1980s, the role of adversariality in argumentation has been extensively discussed within different domains. Prima facie, there seem to be two extreme positions on this issue: argumentation should (ideally at least) never be adversarial, as we should always aim for cooperative argumentative engagement; argumentation should be and in fact is always adversarial, given that adversariality (when suitably conceptualized) is an intrinsic property of argumentation. I here defend the view that specific instances of argumentation are (and should be) adversarial or cooperative to different degrees. What determines whether an argumentative situation should be primarily adversarial or primarily cooperative are contextual features and background conditions external to the argumentative situation itself, in particular the extent to which the parties involved have prior conflicting or else convergent interests. To further develop this claim, I consider three teloi that are frequently associated with argumentation: the epistemic telos, the consensus-building telos, and the conflict management telos. I start with a brief discussion of the concepts of adversariality, cooperation, and conflict in general. I then sketch the main lines of the debates in the recent literature on adversariality in argumentation. Next, I discuss the three teloi of argumentation listed above in turn, emphasizing the roles of adversariality and cooperation for each of them.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)873-886
Number of pages14
JournalTopoi
Volume40
Issue number5
Early online date23 Dec 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Thanks to Scott Aikin, Elias Anttila, John Casey, Daniel Cohen, Hein Duijf, Ian Kidd, Katharina Stevens, and Merel Talbi for comments on earlier drafts and/or various contributions to the development of the ideas presented here. This work was supported by H2020 European Research Council [771074-SEA].

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Author(s).

Keywords

  • Adversariality
  • Agonism
  • Argumentation
  • Consensus
  • Cooperation
  • Scientific norms

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Who’s Afraid of Adversariality? Conflict and Cooperation in Argumentation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this