Abstract
Research on romantic jealousy has traditionally focused on sex differences. We investigated why individuals vary in romantic jealousy, even within the sexes, using a genetically informed design of ~7700 Finnish twins and their siblings. First, we estimated genetic, shared environmental and nonshared environmental influences on jealousy, Second, we examined relations between jealousy and several variables that have been hypothesized to relate to jealousy because they increase the risk (e.g., mate-value discrepancy) or costs (e.g., restricted sociosexuality) of infidelity. Jealousy was 29% heritable, and non-shared environmental influences explained the remaining variance. The magnitude and sources of genetic influences did not differ between the sexes. Jealousy was associated with: having a lower mate value relative to one's partner; having less trust in one's current partner; having been cheated by a previous or current partner; and having more restricted sociosexual attitude and desire. Within monozygotic twin pairs, the twin with more restricted sociosexual desire and less trust in their partner than his or her co-twin experienced significantly more jealousy, showing that these associations were not merely due to the same genes or family environment giving rise to both sociosexual desire or trust and jealousy. The association between sociosexual attitude and jealousy was predominantly explained by genetic factors (74%), whereas all other associations with jealousy were mostly influenced by nonshared environmental (non-familial) factors (estimates >71%). Overall, our findings provide some of the most robust support to date on the importance of variables predicted by mate-guarding accounts to explain why people vary in jealousy.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 26-33 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Evolution and Human Behavior |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 27 Aug 2021 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:The data collection costs, J.M. Tybur and L.W. Wesseldijk were supported by the European Research Council (ERC) Grant StG-2015 680002-HBIS . P. Jern was supported by Grants 274521 , 284385 , and 319403 from the Academy of Finland . T.R. Kupfer was supported by the European Research Council Grant ( MSCA-IF-2017-800096-EmoPun ). B.P. Zietsch was supported by the Australian Research Council ( FT160100298 ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s)
Funding
The data collection costs, J.M. Tybur and L.W. Wesseldijk were supported by the European Research Council (ERC) Grant StG-2015 680002-HBIS . P. Jern was supported by Grants 274521 , 284385 , and 319403 from the Academy of Finland . T.R. Kupfer was supported by the European Research Council Grant ( MSCA-IF-2017-800096-EmoPun ). B.P. Zietsch was supported by the Australian Research Council ( FT160100298 ).
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| Horizon 2020 Framework Programme | 680002, 800096 |
| European Research Council | 274521, 319403, StG-2015 680002-HBIS, 284385 |
| Australian Research Council | FT160100298 |
| Academy of Finland | MSCA-IF-2017-800096-EmoPun |
Keywords
- Genetics
- Individual differences
- Infidelity
- Jealousy
- Mate value discrepancy
- Sociosexuality
- Trust
- Twins