Why developers matter: The case of patient portals

Anastasia V. Sergeeva*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Existing studies on patient data portals are informative with respect to the patient and physician perspectives, yet relatively little attention has been paid to the role of developers. This case study focuses on how developers view the meaning and purpose of patient portals and how their perspective differs from that of physicians. The findings show that developers and physicians have different views on whether and how the portals can help achieve transparency, efficiency, and patient empowerment. This misalignment emerges because each group makes sense of the portal through a different frame of how they see patient data, medical work, and patient behavior. The study also finds that developers cope with the frame differences by engaging in practices of coproducing, bypassing, and reframing. The implication of the study is that technological frame analysis needs to incorporate the growing complexity and institutional character of modern technology, the diversity of target groups it serves, and their corresponding frames. The study also suggests that developers, instead of being seen as mere operational IT support, may need to be seen as strategically important actor groups for healthcare organizations—since their practices matter for the strategic agenda of transforming healthcare into a more patient-centric practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-23
Number of pages23
JournalHealth Informatics Journal
Volume29
Issue number1
Early online date24 Jan 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The author would like to thank Fleur Deutz for the excellent research assistance in collecting field data. The paper has benefitted from insightful guidance of the anonymous reviewers. The author is also grateful for the generous feedback of Ella Hafermalz, Kathleen Pine and Stanislav Vlasov. The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the Dutch Research Council (NWO) (406.18.EB.030).

Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the Dutch Research Council (NWO) (406.18.EB.030).

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2023.

Funding

The author would like to thank Fleur Deutz for the excellent research assistance in collecting field data. The paper has benefitted from insightful guidance of the anonymous reviewers. The author is also grateful for the generous feedback of Ella Hafermalz, Kathleen Pine and Stanislav Vlasov. The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the Dutch Research Council (NWO) (406.18.EB.030). The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the Dutch Research Council (NWO) (406.18.EB.030).

Keywords

  • implementation
  • patient empowerment
  • patient portals
  • physician resistance
  • technological frames
  • transparency of patient data
  • user-centered design

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why developers matter: The case of patient portals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this