Why Not? Explaining Missing Entailments with Evee

Christian Alrabbaa*, Stefan Borgwardt, Tom Friese, Patrick Koopmann, Mikhail Kotlov

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book / Report / Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Understanding logical entailments derived by a description logic reasoner is not always straight-forward for ontology users. For this reason, various methods for explaining entailments using justifications and proofs have been developed and implemented as plug-ins for the ontology editor Protégé. However, when the user expects a missing consequence to hold, it is equally important to explain why it does not follow from the ontology. In this paper, we describe a new version of Evee, a Protégé plugin that now also provides explanations for missing consequences, via existing and new techniques based on abduction and counterexamples.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationDL 2023 Description Logics 2023
Subtitle of host publicationProceedings of the 36th International Workshop on Description Logics (DL 2023) co-located with the 20th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning and the 21st International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (KR 2023 and NMR 2023). Rhodes, Greece, September 2-4, 2023
EditorsOliver Kutz, Carsten Lutz, Ana Ozaki
PublisherCEUR-WS.org
Pages1-13
Number of pages13
Publication statusPublished - 2023
Event36th International Workshop on Description Logics, DL 2023 - Rhodes, Greece
Duration: 2 Sept 20234 Sept 2023

Publication series

NameCEUR Workshop Proceedings
PublisherCEUR Workshop Proceedings
Volume3515
ISSN (Print)1613-0073

Conference

Conference36th International Workshop on Description Logics, DL 2023
Country/TerritoryGreece
CityRhodes
Period2/09/234/09/23

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This work was supported by DFG grant 389792660 as part of TRR 248 – CPEC (see https: //perspicuous-computing.science).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Copyright for this paper by its authors.

Funding

This work was supported by DFG grant 389792660 as part of TRR 248 – CPEC (see https: //perspicuous-computing.science).

Keywords

  • Abduction
  • Counterexamples
  • Explanations
  • Protégé plugin

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why Not? Explaining Missing Entailments with Evee'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this