Why prudence is needed when interpreting articles reporting clinical trials results in mental health.

R. Dal-Ré , J. Bobes , Pim Cuijpers

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

117 Downloads (Pure)


Background: Clinical trial results' reliability is impacted by reporting bias. This is primarily manifested as publication bias and outcome reporting bias. Mental health trials' specific features: Mental health trials are prone to two methodological deficiencies: (1) using small numbers of participants that facilitates false positive findings and exaggerated size effects, and (2) the obligatory use of psychometric scales that require subjective assessments. These two deficiencies contribute to the publication of unreliable results. Considerable reporting bias has been found in safety and efficacy findings in psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy trials. Reporting bias can be carried forward to meta-analyses, a key source for clinical practice guidelines. The final result is the frequent overestimation of treatment effects that could impact patients and clinician-informed decisions. Mechanisms to prevent outcome reporting bias: Prospective registration of trials and publication of results are the two major methods to reduce reporting bias. Prospective trial registration will allow checking whether they are published (so it will help to prevent publication bias) and, if published, whether those outcomes and analyses that were deemed as appropriate before trial commencement are actually published (hence helping to find out selective reporting of outcomes). Unfortunately, the rate of registered trials in mental health interventions is low and, frequently, of poor quality. Conclusion: Clinicians should be prudent when interpreting the results of published trials and some meta-analyses - such as those conducted by scientists working for the sponsor company or those that only include published trials. Prescribers, however, should be confident when prescribing drugs following the summary of product characteristics, since regulatory agencies have access to all clinical trial results.

Original languageEnglish
Article number143
Pages (from-to)143
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2017


Dive into the research topics of 'Why prudence is needed when interpreting articles reporting clinical trials results in mental health.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this