Why Social Threat Motivates Malevolent Creativity

Matthijs Baas, Marieke Roskes, Severine Koch, Yujie Cheng, Carsten K W De Dreu

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

History is rife with examples of the dark side of creativity-ingenious weapons, novel torture practices, and creative terrorist attacks-yet its psychological origins are sparsely addressed and poorly understood. Building on work showing that social threat induces focused thinking as well as aggressive cognitions and readiness to fight, we propose that threats lead to more malevolent creativity and less creativity in threat-irrelevant domains. Prisoner's dilemma games were modified to evoke threat of exploitation. Participants then generated novel brick uses (Study 1, N = 113) or negotiation tactics (Study 2; N = 79). High (vs. low) social threat led to more "malevolent" creativity (e.g., using bricks as weapons; using intimidation as negotiation tactic). Social threat reduced nonthreat-related creative ideation only in Study 1. Study 2 showed that the increase of malevolent creativity was due to the motivation to defend and aggress, and emerged especially among individuals with a high need for cognition.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)146167219838551
JournalPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 31 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

Creativity
Weapons
Negotiating
Cognition
Torture
Motivation
History
Psychology

Cite this

Baas, Matthijs ; Roskes, Marieke ; Koch, Severine ; Cheng, Yujie ; De Dreu, Carsten K W. / Why Social Threat Motivates Malevolent Creativity. In: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2019 ; pp. 146167219838551.
@article{cb4be09829f64c7691b6e6fe9f7cf9b9,
title = "Why Social Threat Motivates Malevolent Creativity",
abstract = "History is rife with examples of the dark side of creativity-ingenious weapons, novel torture practices, and creative terrorist attacks-yet its psychological origins are sparsely addressed and poorly understood. Building on work showing that social threat induces focused thinking as well as aggressive cognitions and readiness to fight, we propose that threats lead to more malevolent creativity and less creativity in threat-irrelevant domains. Prisoner's dilemma games were modified to evoke threat of exploitation. Participants then generated novel brick uses (Study 1, N = 113) or negotiation tactics (Study 2; N = 79). High (vs. low) social threat led to more {"}malevolent{"} creativity (e.g., using bricks as weapons; using intimidation as negotiation tactic). Social threat reduced nonthreat-related creative ideation only in Study 1. Study 2 showed that the increase of malevolent creativity was due to the motivation to defend and aggress, and emerged especially among individuals with a high need for cognition.",
author = "Matthijs Baas and Marieke Roskes and Severine Koch and Yujie Cheng and {De Dreu}, {Carsten K W}",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1177/0146167219838551",
language = "English",
pages = "146167219838551",
journal = "Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin",
issn = "0146-1672",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

Why Social Threat Motivates Malevolent Creativity. / Baas, Matthijs; Roskes, Marieke; Koch, Severine; Cheng, Yujie; De Dreu, Carsten K W.

In: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31.03.2019, p. 146167219838551.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why Social Threat Motivates Malevolent Creativity

AU - Baas, Matthijs

AU - Roskes, Marieke

AU - Koch, Severine

AU - Cheng, Yujie

AU - De Dreu, Carsten K W

PY - 2019/3/31

Y1 - 2019/3/31

N2 - History is rife with examples of the dark side of creativity-ingenious weapons, novel torture practices, and creative terrorist attacks-yet its psychological origins are sparsely addressed and poorly understood. Building on work showing that social threat induces focused thinking as well as aggressive cognitions and readiness to fight, we propose that threats lead to more malevolent creativity and less creativity in threat-irrelevant domains. Prisoner's dilemma games were modified to evoke threat of exploitation. Participants then generated novel brick uses (Study 1, N = 113) or negotiation tactics (Study 2; N = 79). High (vs. low) social threat led to more "malevolent" creativity (e.g., using bricks as weapons; using intimidation as negotiation tactic). Social threat reduced nonthreat-related creative ideation only in Study 1. Study 2 showed that the increase of malevolent creativity was due to the motivation to defend and aggress, and emerged especially among individuals with a high need for cognition.

AB - History is rife with examples of the dark side of creativity-ingenious weapons, novel torture practices, and creative terrorist attacks-yet its psychological origins are sparsely addressed and poorly understood. Building on work showing that social threat induces focused thinking as well as aggressive cognitions and readiness to fight, we propose that threats lead to more malevolent creativity and less creativity in threat-irrelevant domains. Prisoner's dilemma games were modified to evoke threat of exploitation. Participants then generated novel brick uses (Study 1, N = 113) or negotiation tactics (Study 2; N = 79). High (vs. low) social threat led to more "malevolent" creativity (e.g., using bricks as weapons; using intimidation as negotiation tactic). Social threat reduced nonthreat-related creative ideation only in Study 1. Study 2 showed that the increase of malevolent creativity was due to the motivation to defend and aggress, and emerged especially among individuals with a high need for cognition.

U2 - 10.1177/0146167219838551

DO - 10.1177/0146167219838551

M3 - Article

SP - 146167219838551

JO - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

JF - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

SN - 0146-1672

ER -