Abstract
If God, as the Biblical narratives suggest, cares in a special way for the marginal (a character trait we dubbed ‘adunamophilia’), this appears to be at odds with God’s perfect goodness, in the sense of treating all people fairly and with equal care. After a brief overview of God’s adunamophilia as witnessed to by various Bible passages and the Christian tradition more broadly, we argue that the tension can be reduced but not resolved by considering God’s adunamophilia in relation to God’s righteousness. Going beyond this, we propose to consider God’s adunamophilia as a manifestation of God’s personal preference, which is not necessarily morally blameworthy. As creatures, humans are challenged to accept this scandalous preference, ultimately expressed in Christ’s life among the marginal in his humiliation and death on the cross.
| Original language | Dutch |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 9-25 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Theologia Reformata |
| Volume | 63 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2020 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
-
De tegendraadse keuzes van God zijn voor ons een les in nederigheid en navolging
Dekker, P. D., 14 Nov 2023, In: Nederlands Dagblad.Research output: Contribution to Journal › Article › Popular
-
The Goodness and Freedom of God: Reading Gutiérrez’s preferential option as an Augustinian account of divine election
Dekker, P. D., 10 Jun 2022, (Unpublished).Research output: Contribution to Conference › Paper › Academic
-
Bevrijdingstheologie helpt kloof arm-rijk overbruggen
Dekker, P. D., 3 Feb 2022, In: Nederlands Dagblad. p. 11 1 p.Research output: Contribution to Journal › Article › Popular
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver