Abstract
Polygenic score (PGS) predictions of educational achievement are sizeable at the population level. Yet, population-level PGS predictions are environmentally confounded, due to gene-environment correlations, assortative mating, and population stratification. This confounding complicates the interpretation and application of PGS predictions of educational achievement. Here, we charted the variability of PGS predictions in N = 8115 dizygotic twins from UK, US, Swedish, and German samples aged 7 to 19 years. Population-level PGS predictions of educational achievement ranged from β = 0.16 to β = 0.37 across ages and countries. Discerning within- and between-family level estimates, we found that 10 to 65% of the population-level PGS predictions were due to environmental confounding, of which 29 to 100% were accounted for by family socioeconomic status. Variability in within-family and population-level PGS predictions was largely unsystematic across countries' school systems (multi-tiered vs. comprehensive) and children's ages. Therefore, interpretations regarding the sources of environmental confounding effects on educational achievement remain, at present, speculative.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2029-2037 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Molecular Psychiatry |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 20 Nov 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2026 |
Bibliographical note
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.Funding
TEDS is supported by the UK Medical Research Council (MR/V012878/1 and previously MR/M021475/1), with additional support from the US National Institutes of Health (AG046938). The Environmental Risk (E-Risk) Study is funded by grants from the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) [G1002190; MR/X010791/1]. Additional support for E-Risk was provided by the US National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [HD077482] and the Jacobs Foundation. The Minnesota Twin Family Study was supported in part through grants from the National Institutes of Health R01 DA 042755, R01HG011035, R01 DA 054087, R01 DA 044283. The Swedish Twin Registry (STR) is managed by the Karolinska Institute and receives additional funding through the Swedish Research Council (2017-00641). Additional funding for STR comes from the Ragnar Söderberg Foundation (E9/11), and the Swedish Research Council (421-2013-1061). TwinLife is funded by grants from the German Research Foundation (DFG; project number: 220286500 and 428902522). SvS held fellowships from the Jacobs Foundation (2022-2027) and the Paris Institute of Advanced Study (2023-2024) during the writing of this manuscript. HLF was supported by the UK ESRC Centre for Society and Mental Health at King’s College London [ES/S012567/1]. The position of CP is funded by the DFG (funding number 428902552). OP, RA, and SO were supported by the Swedish Research Council (2019-00244; 2023-01343). TEDS is supported by the UK Medical Research Council (MR/V012878/1 and previously MR/M021475/1), with additional support from the US National Institutes of Health (AG046938). The Environmental Risk (E-Risk) Study is funded by grants from the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) [G1002190; MR/X010791/1]. Additional support for E-Risk was provided by the US National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [HD077482] and the Jacobs Foundation. The Minnesota Twin Family Study was supported in part through grants from the National Institutes of Health R01 DA 042755, R01HG011035, R01 DA 054087, R01 DA 044283. The Swedish Twin Registry (STR) is managed by the Karolinska Institute and receives additional funding through the Swedish Research Council (2017-00641). Additional funding for STR comes from the Ragnar Söderberg Foundation (E9/11), and the Swedish Research Council (421-2013-1061). TwinLife is funded by grants from the German Research Foundation (DFG; project number: 220286500 and 428902522). SvS held fellowships from the Jacobs Foundation (2022-2027) and the Paris Institute of Advanced Study (2023-2024) during the writing of this manuscript. HLF was supported by the UK ESRC Centre for Society and Mental Health at King’s College London [ES/S012567/1]. The position of CP is funded by the DFG (funding number 428902552). OP, RA, and SO were supported by the Swedish Research Council (2019-00244; 2023-01343).
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| Economic and Social Research Council | |
| Karolinska Institutet | |
| King's College London | 2019-00244, 2023-01343, ES/S012567/1, 428902552 |
| National Institutes of Health | AG046938 |
| Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft | 220286500, 2022-2027, 428902522 |
| Medical Research Council | MR/V012878/1, MR/X010791/1, G1002190, MR/M021475/1 |
| Institut d’études avancées de Paris | 2023-2024 |
| Ragnar Söderbergs stiftelse | 421-2013-1061, E9/11 |
| Vetenskapsrådet | 2017-00641 |
| Jacobs Foundation | R01HG011035, R01 DA 042755, R01 DA 044283, R01 DA 054087 |
| National Institute of Child Health and Human Development | HD077482 |
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver