Working mechanisms of dyadic, psychosocial, activating interventions for people with dementia and informal caregivers: a qualitative study

Netta Van t. Leven, Jacomine de Lange, Eva S. van der Ploeg, Anne Margriet Pot

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: People living with dementia (PWD) and their informal caregivers often report difficulties in maintaining their usual activities. Several dyadic, psychosocial, activating interventions were developed to create insight into how to cope with limitations in a practical way and to increase skills for maintaining personal activities. Effects of these interventions varied so far. More knowledge on the working mechanisms of activating interventions might help to increase their impact. This study will provide more insights into the working mechanisms of three dyadic, psychosocial, activating interventions as the participating PWD, caregivers, and coaches perceived them during the interventions.

Participants and methods: We used a qualitative design with semi-structured interviews of 34 dyads that included 27 PWD, 34 caregivers, and 19 coaches. The data were analyzed with the constant comparative method.

Results: Many PWD and caregivers found capacity-building approaches beneficial. We identified "empowerment" as the core theme. Three working mechanisms explained why the interventions were perceived as having a beneficial impact: 1) enabling activities without providing false hope; 2) exploring the most important personal activity needs of the PWD and caregivers; and 3) a solution-focused approach to adapt, test, and practice activities. An individualized approach contributed to positive change.

Conclusion: For the overarching working mechanism empowerment, expertise in the field of dementia and psychological skills of coaches seem to be important. Assessing the needs, capacities, and limitations of both the PWD and the caregivers to take part in activities seems to be key, as well as the communication about it and the skills to teach a solution-focused approach. Studies on the impact of psychosocial and activating interventions might benefit from considering outcome measures directed at empowerment, along with aspects such as hope and belief in one's own capacities versus traditional outcome measures as mood, burden, or quality of life.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1847-1857
Number of pages11
JournalClinical interventions in aging
Volume13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Sep 2018

Fingerprint

Caregivers
Dementia
Hope
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Capacity Building
Communication
Quality of Life
Interviews
Psychology
Power (Psychology)
Mentoring

Keywords

  • components
  • exercise
  • occupational therapy
  • pleasant events
  • psychosocial interventions
  • working mechanisms

Cite this

@article{3bdee594419c47859b66d7c88f8b3c3f,
title = "Working mechanisms of dyadic, psychosocial, activating interventions for people with dementia and informal caregivers: a qualitative study",
abstract = "Background: People living with dementia (PWD) and their informal caregivers often report difficulties in maintaining their usual activities. Several dyadic, psychosocial, activating interventions were developed to create insight into how to cope with limitations in a practical way and to increase skills for maintaining personal activities. Effects of these interventions varied so far. More knowledge on the working mechanisms of activating interventions might help to increase their impact. This study will provide more insights into the working mechanisms of three dyadic, psychosocial, activating interventions as the participating PWD, caregivers, and coaches perceived them during the interventions.Participants and methods: We used a qualitative design with semi-structured interviews of 34 dyads that included 27 PWD, 34 caregivers, and 19 coaches. The data were analyzed with the constant comparative method.Results: Many PWD and caregivers found capacity-building approaches beneficial. We identified {"}empowerment{"} as the core theme. Three working mechanisms explained why the interventions were perceived as having a beneficial impact: 1) enabling activities without providing false hope; 2) exploring the most important personal activity needs of the PWD and caregivers; and 3) a solution-focused approach to adapt, test, and practice activities. An individualized approach contributed to positive change.Conclusion: For the overarching working mechanism empowerment, expertise in the field of dementia and psychological skills of coaches seem to be important. Assessing the needs, capacities, and limitations of both the PWD and the caregivers to take part in activities seems to be key, as well as the communication about it and the skills to teach a solution-focused approach. Studies on the impact of psychosocial and activating interventions might benefit from considering outcome measures directed at empowerment, along with aspects such as hope and belief in one's own capacities versus traditional outcome measures as mood, burden, or quality of life.",
keywords = "components, exercise, occupational therapy, pleasant events, psychosocial interventions, working mechanisms",
author = "Leven, {Netta Van t.} and {de Lange}, Jacomine and {van der Ploeg}, {Eva S.} and Pot, {Anne Margriet}",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "27",
doi = "10.2147/CIA.S160363",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "1847--1857",
journal = "Clinical interventions in aging",
issn = "1178-1998",
publisher = "Dove Medical Press",

}

Working mechanisms of dyadic, psychosocial, activating interventions for people with dementia and informal caregivers : a qualitative study. / Leven, Netta Van t.; de Lange, Jacomine; van der Ploeg, Eva S.; Pot, Anne Margriet.

In: Clinical interventions in aging, Vol. 13, 27.09.2018, p. 1847-1857.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Working mechanisms of dyadic, psychosocial, activating interventions for people with dementia and informal caregivers

T2 - a qualitative study

AU - Leven, Netta Van t.

AU - de Lange, Jacomine

AU - van der Ploeg, Eva S.

AU - Pot, Anne Margriet

PY - 2018/9/27

Y1 - 2018/9/27

N2 - Background: People living with dementia (PWD) and their informal caregivers often report difficulties in maintaining their usual activities. Several dyadic, psychosocial, activating interventions were developed to create insight into how to cope with limitations in a practical way and to increase skills for maintaining personal activities. Effects of these interventions varied so far. More knowledge on the working mechanisms of activating interventions might help to increase their impact. This study will provide more insights into the working mechanisms of three dyadic, psychosocial, activating interventions as the participating PWD, caregivers, and coaches perceived them during the interventions.Participants and methods: We used a qualitative design with semi-structured interviews of 34 dyads that included 27 PWD, 34 caregivers, and 19 coaches. The data were analyzed with the constant comparative method.Results: Many PWD and caregivers found capacity-building approaches beneficial. We identified "empowerment" as the core theme. Three working mechanisms explained why the interventions were perceived as having a beneficial impact: 1) enabling activities without providing false hope; 2) exploring the most important personal activity needs of the PWD and caregivers; and 3) a solution-focused approach to adapt, test, and practice activities. An individualized approach contributed to positive change.Conclusion: For the overarching working mechanism empowerment, expertise in the field of dementia and psychological skills of coaches seem to be important. Assessing the needs, capacities, and limitations of both the PWD and the caregivers to take part in activities seems to be key, as well as the communication about it and the skills to teach a solution-focused approach. Studies on the impact of psychosocial and activating interventions might benefit from considering outcome measures directed at empowerment, along with aspects such as hope and belief in one's own capacities versus traditional outcome measures as mood, burden, or quality of life.

AB - Background: People living with dementia (PWD) and their informal caregivers often report difficulties in maintaining their usual activities. Several dyadic, psychosocial, activating interventions were developed to create insight into how to cope with limitations in a practical way and to increase skills for maintaining personal activities. Effects of these interventions varied so far. More knowledge on the working mechanisms of activating interventions might help to increase their impact. This study will provide more insights into the working mechanisms of three dyadic, psychosocial, activating interventions as the participating PWD, caregivers, and coaches perceived them during the interventions.Participants and methods: We used a qualitative design with semi-structured interviews of 34 dyads that included 27 PWD, 34 caregivers, and 19 coaches. The data were analyzed with the constant comparative method.Results: Many PWD and caregivers found capacity-building approaches beneficial. We identified "empowerment" as the core theme. Three working mechanisms explained why the interventions were perceived as having a beneficial impact: 1) enabling activities without providing false hope; 2) exploring the most important personal activity needs of the PWD and caregivers; and 3) a solution-focused approach to adapt, test, and practice activities. An individualized approach contributed to positive change.Conclusion: For the overarching working mechanism empowerment, expertise in the field of dementia and psychological skills of coaches seem to be important. Assessing the needs, capacities, and limitations of both the PWD and the caregivers to take part in activities seems to be key, as well as the communication about it and the skills to teach a solution-focused approach. Studies on the impact of psychosocial and activating interventions might benefit from considering outcome measures directed at empowerment, along with aspects such as hope and belief in one's own capacities versus traditional outcome measures as mood, burden, or quality of life.

KW - components

KW - exercise

KW - occupational therapy

KW - pleasant events

KW - psychosocial interventions

KW - working mechanisms

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054779327&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054779327&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2147/CIA.S160363

DO - 10.2147/CIA.S160363

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 1847

EP - 1857

JO - Clinical interventions in aging

JF - Clinical interventions in aging

SN - 1178-1998

ER -