World Politics and Organizational Fields: The Case of Transnational Sustainability Governance

K. Dingwerth, P.H. Pattberg

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Transnational rule-making organizations have proliferated in the area of sustainability politics. In this article, we explore why these organizations share a set of core features that appear overly costly at first sight. We argue that norms that evolved out of the social interaction among transnational rule-making organizations account for this phenomenon. Thus, in the early 1990s, an organizational field of transnational rule-making has gradually developed in the field of environmental politics. Responding to a broader social discourse about global governance that stressed a need for innovative forms of cooperation among different societal sectors, this organizational field gained in legitimacy and strength. A set of commonly accepted core norms, the increasing density of interaction among the field's members, and the success and legitimacy ascribed to the field's key players by the outside world helped to solidify the organizational field until it eventually developed a 'life of its own'. © The Author(s) 2009.
LanguageEnglish
Pages707-743
JournalEuropean Journal of International Relations
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

world politics
sustainability
governance
legitimacy
form of cooperation
politics
global governance
interaction
discourse

Cite this

@article{644baed67a734c36928093e0af0b61ff,
title = "World Politics and Organizational Fields: The Case of Transnational Sustainability Governance",
abstract = "Transnational rule-making organizations have proliferated in the area of sustainability politics. In this article, we explore why these organizations share a set of core features that appear overly costly at first sight. We argue that norms that evolved out of the social interaction among transnational rule-making organizations account for this phenomenon. Thus, in the early 1990s, an organizational field of transnational rule-making has gradually developed in the field of environmental politics. Responding to a broader social discourse about global governance that stressed a need for innovative forms of cooperation among different societal sectors, this organizational field gained in legitimacy and strength. A set of commonly accepted core norms, the increasing density of interaction among the field's members, and the success and legitimacy ascribed to the field's key players by the outside world helped to solidify the organizational field until it eventually developed a 'life of its own'. {\circledC} The Author(s) 2009.",
author = "K. Dingwerth and P.H. Pattberg",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1177/1354066109345056",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "707--743",
journal = "European Journal of International Relations",
issn = "1354-0661",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

World Politics and Organizational Fields: The Case of Transnational Sustainability Governance. / Dingwerth, K.; Pattberg, P.H.

In: European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2009, p. 707-743.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - World Politics and Organizational Fields: The Case of Transnational Sustainability Governance

AU - Dingwerth, K.

AU - Pattberg, P.H.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Transnational rule-making organizations have proliferated in the area of sustainability politics. In this article, we explore why these organizations share a set of core features that appear overly costly at first sight. We argue that norms that evolved out of the social interaction among transnational rule-making organizations account for this phenomenon. Thus, in the early 1990s, an organizational field of transnational rule-making has gradually developed in the field of environmental politics. Responding to a broader social discourse about global governance that stressed a need for innovative forms of cooperation among different societal sectors, this organizational field gained in legitimacy and strength. A set of commonly accepted core norms, the increasing density of interaction among the field's members, and the success and legitimacy ascribed to the field's key players by the outside world helped to solidify the organizational field until it eventually developed a 'life of its own'. © The Author(s) 2009.

AB - Transnational rule-making organizations have proliferated in the area of sustainability politics. In this article, we explore why these organizations share a set of core features that appear overly costly at first sight. We argue that norms that evolved out of the social interaction among transnational rule-making organizations account for this phenomenon. Thus, in the early 1990s, an organizational field of transnational rule-making has gradually developed in the field of environmental politics. Responding to a broader social discourse about global governance that stressed a need for innovative forms of cooperation among different societal sectors, this organizational field gained in legitimacy and strength. A set of commonly accepted core norms, the increasing density of interaction among the field's members, and the success and legitimacy ascribed to the field's key players by the outside world helped to solidify the organizational field until it eventually developed a 'life of its own'. © The Author(s) 2009.

U2 - 10.1177/1354066109345056

DO - 10.1177/1354066109345056

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 707

EP - 743

JO - European Journal of International Relations

T2 - European Journal of International Relations

JF - European Journal of International Relations

SN - 1354-0661

IS - 4

ER -