You don’t know: Knowledge as supportive alibi evidence

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

129 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Until now, supportive evidence for alibis has been conceptualised into two distinct types: witness and physical evidence. The present study examined whether knowledge, as a third type of supportive evidence, can contribute to the understanding of evidence for alibis. Three experiments were conducted in which police detectives, laypersons and undergraduate students were asked to evaluate four alibis with witness, physical or knowledge supportive evidence, or with no supportive evidence. The results from the three experiments show that knowledge evidence is equally believable as strong witness evidence. We also found that not all items of strong physical evidence are evaluated as equally strong and believable. We therefore suggest adjusting the criteria to determine the strength of physical evidence and conducting more research on knowledge evidence.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)695-712
Number of pages18
JournalPsychiatry, Psychology and Law
Volume30
Issue number5
Early online date18 Sept 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Sept 2023

Funding

This study was financially supported by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research [NWO, grant number 404-10-349]. We would like to thank Kim Michelle Rietman and Michelle Huygen for their help in collecting the data.

FundersFunder number
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek404-10-349

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
      SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'You don’t know: Knowledge as supportive alibi evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this